therealpm: (Default)
[personal profile] therealpm
According to Nick Robinson, the problem with Labour is that we're simply too interesting; the poor boy can't take his eyes off us.

Labourites: feel suitably chastened. Unlike our conservative counterparts, we just haven't got the hang of 'dull'.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealpm.livejournal.com
Well quite.

I seem to recall you comparing me unfavourably to a crow-scarer last week, would you care to have a little competition at stealth?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 08:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paddythebamf.livejournal.com
What did you have in mind? And are you going to be using magical means?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 08:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealpm.livejournal.com
First one to get from the entrance of the chamber to the Speaker's chair during Treasury Questions without being noticed wins.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paddythebamf.livejournal.com
Hah, very good! That promises to be quite the challenge.

Though with Balls and whatsisname going at it hammer and tongs they probably wouldn't notice a bomb going off in their general vicinity.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealpm.livejournal.com
I knew you'd be up for it. Would you care to wager anything on the outcome?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 09:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paddythebamf.livejournal.com
I consider a small wager to be obligatory under these circumstances. A bottle of the Speaker's finest to the winner?

By the way, do you have any particular reason for stalking the Speaker while he's at work, or should I not ask in the name of plausible deniability?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 09:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealpm.livejournal.com
Agreed.

No, no reason; however I propose that John referee the match, with the Chair acting as a convenient finishing line. I'm sure he won't mind, there won't be much else requiring his attention.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 09:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paddythebamf.livejournal.com
That's quite reassuring, Peter.

I see you're expecting an uneventful debate--or were New Labour standards of chaos much higher?

All I can say is, if Bercow's proposing to give Balls free run of the house for the debate then the two of us could just run naked down the middle and I doubt anybody would notice.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] therealpm.livejournal.com
I am sure John is practiced enough in his role as to be able to maintain full order in the House with a look, or at worst, a raised eyebrow at the offending member. If not, well, nothing teaches a person to swim faster than being thrown in at the deep end.

I'm off to catch a good night's sleep before next week. Those camp beds really aren't all they're cracked up to be.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-01-23 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paddythebamf.livejournal.com
I'm sure he is, so long as those pesky dry Tories don't get going again.

Trust you'll sleep well, old chap. The camp beds really were abominable, weren't they?
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 02:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios